Allison1710

I'm the awkward/weird friend. Manchild.

About Allison1710  
I know everything.
Submit
Posts tagged the internet

Why does everyone hate that TIME article so much? Pt. 3

Ok, I usually like to source things on this blog, but i definitely don’t want to contribute to a gossip blog, so I’m not linking to it (but a Google search could probably get you on your way):

The accompanying story, written by Joel Stein, sums up Millennials as such: They’re narcissistic. They’re lazy. They’re coddled. They’re a bit delusional.

The National Institute of Health backs this up. Among people in their 20s, Narcissistic Personality Disorder is three times as high as in other adults.

However, despite being self-obsessed social-media addicts, these young adults are really the US’ saviors - or at least have the potential to be.

Changing fast in a world undergoing rapid technological shifts, they’re surprisingly optimistic, confident, pragmatic and most of all, adaptable.

I’ll admit that the article (the real one, not this blog thingie) comes to a kind of mixed conclusion, but Stein makes it clear that the Millennials have everything they need to be all right, as Cheap Trick would say (this song is incredibly relevant to the article) and that he certainly believes great things will come from them/us. 

We’re an open generation and are generally interested in where other people are, what they’re doing, what they’re eating (Instagram, Twitter, Foursquare). We understand digital marketing from childhood, giving us a kind of innovation in business that a lot of previous generations had to learn from their previous generations. Do you know how excited the lawyers I speak to get when I tell them I know how Facebook and Twitter work? Or that I can build a basic website? They remained baffled.

The article even talks about how the behavior of Millennials isn’t even that different from previous younger generations; it looks a little bit different because the world is a little bit different. We seem self-absorbed (and I’ll admit that I probably am) because there are so many ways to share what we’re doing right the fuck now. People in the 50s would invite neighbors over for boring vacation slideshows, but Millennials have a different way of doing that in a way that folks from the 50s couldn’t even dream of.

The biggest thing that article brought up that should be given thought to is our purported lack of empathy. And with a very recent run-in with an RPer’s suicide, I believe that stat whole heartedly. It’s been proven that this sort of indirect communication deals with cold empathy; face-to-face/direct communication deals with hot empathy, the amygdala (and related brain circuits) controls. It’s not the same when you communicate through a screen.

So, in the end: we feel entitled, we’re narcissistic, and we just sort of exist. But so did every youth culture before us, we simply live in a different environment now and our behavior had to mutate in response to those environmental changes. We aren’t worse or bad, we simply are. We have great potential to do some real world-changing things. We even have the know-how. Just give it (and us) some time.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on the article. 

Why does everyone hate that TIME article so much? Pt. 2

The article lists the birth years 1980-2000. What I am especially upset and disappointed about that post that was going around is that no one seemed to care about the little subtitle (because, certainly, they noticed it and replaced it with others) “Why they’ll save us all.”

That act sort of proves what a lot of the article says (at the beginning, you really need to read all of it), but the article itself isn’t a rant complaining about a generation. It’s interpretation of data, the preconceived notions we get from that data, and why those preconceived notions are wrong.

This is just another reason I should quit tumblr for good, along with several of the social justice bloggers. I feel like I shouldn’t be stunned there were so many lazy/shallow people on the internet, but here I am, absolutely stunned.

No more internet for a while.

(Source: lizziebthebasedgod)

john-windything-egbert:

someone should do a voice recording of all of these

Challenge: accepted.

gatsbygal:

okcgoldmine:

via illusion-o. a man of many collections

if i saw a grown man in a suit getting his photo taken next to ponies at a toys r us i would get security involved

lol

gatsbygal:

okcgoldmine:

via illusion-o. a man of many collections

if i saw a grown man in a suit getting his photo taken next to ponies at a toys r us i would get security involved

lol

I kind of just started watching Ze Frank videos, I was led there by vlogbrothers.

I’m just…really glad that these kinds of videos exist. There’s no real set subject, and I sometimes think it’s difficult to take on subject matter that doesn’t have to do with you personally, but everybody generally and make it all work out in a way that’s actually pretty life-affirming and positive. 

It’s always good to see things like that. Images are so important. 

I need to re-think the way I use the internet.

Not to say that I’m going to use it for “good,” but I actually have a really closed-off approach to online interaction, and the whole of the interwebz, at least nowadays, is pretty much designed to make people feel connected and not so alone. 

I’ll have to think on this and report back later.

(Source: youtu.be)

notbecauseofvictories:

image

[made rebloggable by request]

I am not watching Hannibal, anon, and will not be. Partly because I don’t think I can enjoy any narrative where Faust is giving in not just to Mephistopheles, but the evil within him—and this is celebrated as a virtuous realization of his real self, a shedding of the needless and arbitrary morality of mankind and ascending to one’s true power and strength. I’ve seen way too many gifsets with beautifully-written tags about how the audience can’t wait until Will stops resisting, stops clinging to his veneer of civilization and just lets himself be like Hannibal, lets himself be what he is. And every time I just want to claw out of my skin, because—how dare you make that beautiful, make it heroic, even in the name of making the audience complicit in the horror. Lay out the temptation, if you like, make the blood a shiny apple-red and the women’s throats white as Bathsheba’s in the moonlight, make Lector’s face as inscrutable as the face of God and as fair as Lucifer’s, but don’t you dare, not for a second, discuss Will’s surrender to it as anything but a fall from grace and goodness. The apple-red of those women’s torn throats demands you acknowledge the horror for what it is.

The rest is because, as cosmoknot put it on Bones’ blog:

i am tired of it too—of stories that revolve around men who are revolving around the mangled bodies of women like dolls who don’t speak and never will despite the strings on their broken backs (X)

Which I think says it more perfectly than I ever could.

#I am really not comfortable with this show and the way it has been recieved by the tumblr community  #since when is giving in to your desire to do violence; your unconcern for humanity and lust for their blood; considered the greatest height  #to which a hero can aspire?  #we resist these things; we defy them  #in the face of nihilism we love; in the face of the moral abyss we build shining towers of rules  #these are not arbitrary things; we invent equality with them; we invent safety and protection and peace  #I am so tired of men with cheekbones and aesthetically appealing shows being allowed to draw from this vein of false anarchy  #which in turn looks a lot like might-makes-right; it looks like neoliberalism; it looks a lot like Darwinism  #but with the blood of women on its hands (notbecauseofvictories)

lol whut

Why is Hannibal so bad and Sherlock so loved? I always thought the shows were very similar.

friendlyneighborhooddeliveryman:

((aslkdjghsd GUYS HELP I’M GONNA PEE

LOOKIT WHAT THE BOT BLOG REBLOGGED THIS TIME))

Wow. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a bot blog that was this inaccurate. 

More Information